Image from Desert News
Last weekend, in the run-up to President Reagan’s 100th birthday, The Christian Science Monitor had a story comparing a number of prominent Republicans with presidential ambitions to Ronald Reagan. While I agree with CSM that it has become quite common for those on the right to compare one politician or another to Ronald Reagan, I found the piece very superficial as the author tried to find a way in which each candidate had certain Reaganesque qualities. I think this is a distortion of and disservice to President Reagan, as his actual record should be compared to anyone claiming his mantle. It may be that journalists are unwilling to examine President Reagan’s actual record, or it may be that they are unwilling to affix the label to any one potential candidate at this time, but when looking at Reagan’s legacy in comparison to today’s potential candidates, there is one who stands out as the most Reaganesque – Jon Huntsman.
Not only are both men former governors of western states and tax reformers, but Reagan and Huntsman are both compromisers, negotiators. President Reagan worked with Democrats and Soviets in the best interests of the American people, and Jon Huntsman has likewise worked with Democrats and the Chinese government, again, in the best interests of the American people. And both Reagan’s and Huntsman’s negotiations have come to bear fruit, as the USSR is no more and the Chinese are beginning to embrace anti-piracy laws.
Both Reagan and Huntsman have a legacy of support for science and technology as well. Most people remember Reagan’s push for technology for national defense, but Jon Huntsman worked tirelessly to support technology development in Utah. But the one area where these two men seem most alike, outside of their bipartisan spirit, is their support for science and the environment. Both Huntsman and Reagan worked to protect the environment. Reagan accepted the science behind the ozone hole and worked to ban CFCs, while Huntsman has said, “We as Republicans can’t shy away from speaking the word ‘environment,’ and we shouldn’t shy away from speaking the words ‘climate change.” President Reagan said of the environment, “And we want to protect and conserve the land on which we live – our countryside, our rivers and mountains, our plains and meadows and forests. This is our patrimony. This is what we leave to our children. And our great moral responsibility is to leave it to them either as we found it or better than we found it.”
While I’m not a big fan of labeling anyone “The Next So-and-So,” and don’t I expect the press or punditry to point out how these two men are both moderates, reasonable, and thoughtful – Jon Huntsman is the one potential republican contender who can rightfully claim Reagan’s mantle.
Of Buckley and Beatles 
I only have one comment. Brahahahahahahahahahaha.
Well reasoned.
Don’t you love it when we pick up intellectuals?
Huntsman is no Reagan. There is no, nor will there ever be another Reagan. He was one of a kind and I, for one, believe the years he was president the United States was respected and we didn’t fear our government. He wasn’t perfect and allowed the dems to spend too much money, however. We need a super Reagan now who will stand up and veto all the dems and Rinos spending projects that don’t have a thing to do with what the Constitution alllows. That pretty much is everything including welfare, medicare, social security and all entitlement programs. It’s going to hurt, folks, but that is where we are.
Of course there will be another Reagan. Unless people continue to insist there can’t be and toss aside worthwhile candidates.
I’m glad you’ve managed to lay the problems of our time at the feet of Democrats and Rinos, though. It must be nice to have clean hands. So no medicare, medicaid or welfare, eh? You’ve just described the perfect path to electoral defeat for, I’d say the next 100 years. Congratulations. Whenever someone I meet from the left makes generalizations about the far right that I once thought were unfair, I will now remember your comment and realize they might be right.
Kate – Perhaps you missed where I wrote I was no fan of labeling people as “the next so-and-so?” Perhaps you’ve missed the point of my piece – that if the press is going to slap this label on anyone in the 2012 field, it ought to be applied to Jon Huntsman.
However, I think Huntsman is the “super Reagan” you’re looking for, so perhaps you’ll give him an opportunity.
There need not be another President Reagan.
Hopefully there will be a President Huntsman.
:-)